How Do the Inherently Suspect and Reasonableness Standards Differ

How do the inherently suspect and reasonableness standards differ?

A) The inherently suspect standard relies on observation; the reasonableness standard relies on data.
B) Under the inherently suspect standard the law is presumed to be valid; under the reasonableness standard the law is presumed to be invalid.
C) The inherently suspect standard is a higher threshold for determining whether the law is constitution.
D) The inherently suspect standard evaluates whether it is rationally connected to a legitimate government goal; the reasonableness standard evaluates whether it is the least restrictive way to achieve that goal.-Consider This: The former standard deals with race and ethnicity,while the latter deals with age and wealth.