“We granted certiorari in these cases in which the United States seeks to enjoin the New York Times and the Washington Post from publishing the contents of a classified study entitled "History of U.S. Decision-Making Process on Viet Nam Policy."…
"Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity."… The Government "thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint."… The District Court…in the New York Times case, and… the District Court…in the Washington Post case held that the Government had not met that burden. We agree.”
--Per Curiam Opinion, New York Times v. United States, 1971
-What principle did the Supreme Court affirm in New York Times Co.v.U.S.(1971) ?
A) prior restraint
B) the equal time rule -Consider This: The equal time rule requires that broadcast stations must sell equal air time to candidates if they sell to any candidates at all.
C) the right to privacy
D) shield laws
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: The abortion debate
In few areas of public
Q13: Which rule bars the use of illegally
Q14: “We granted certiorari in these cases in
Q15: When a defendant in a criminal case
Q16: “There can be no doubt that New
Q18: Which clause prevents the national government from
Q19: In Roth v.United States,the U.S.Supreme Court held
Q20: Prisoners held at the U.S.naval base at
Q21: The Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of
Q22: The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents