“We granted certiorari in these cases in which the United States seeks to enjoin the New York Times and the Washington Post from publishing the contents of a classified study entitled "History of U.S. Decision-Making Process on Viet Nam Policy."…
"Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity."… The Government "thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint."… The District Court…in the New York Times case, and… the District Court…in the Washington Post case held that the Government had not met that burden. We agree.”
--Per Curiam Opinion, New York Times v. United States, 1971
-Which of the cases was decided on the same grounds as New York Times v.United States?
A) Schenk v.United States.
B) New York Times v.Sullivan -Consider This: Although both of these cases involved the New York Times,this case is about libel rather than prior restraint.
C) Near v.Minnesota
D) Miller v.California
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: “Governments, both state and federal, quite properly
Q10: The incorporation doctrine makes the protections of
Q11: Q12: The abortion debate Q13: Which rule bars the use of illegally Q15: When a defendant in a criminal case Q16: “There can be no doubt that New Q17: “We granted certiorari in these cases in Q18: Which clause prevents the national government from Q19: In Roth v.United States,the U.S.Supreme Court held
The decline of executions ![]()
In few areas of public
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents