“To Uphold the Government's Contentions Here, We Would Have to Pile

“To uphold the Government's contentions here, we would have to pile inference upon inference in a manner that would bid fair to convert congressional authority under the Commerce Clause to a general police power of the sort retained by the States. Admittedly, some of our prior cases have taken long steps down that road, giving great deference to congressional action…. The broad language in these opinions has suggested the possibility of additional expansion, but we decline here to proceed any further. To do so would require us to conclude that the Constitution's enumeration of powers does not presuppose something not enumerated… and that there never will be a distinction between what is truly national and what is truly local... This we are unwilling to do.”
--Chief Justice William Rehnquist, United States v. Lopez, 1995
-Which of the following cases involved the same constitutional principle as United States v.Lopez?

A) Gibbons v.Ogden
B) Roe v.Wade
C) Brown v.Board of Education-Consider This: Brown v.Education involved civil rights in public education,as opposed to issues of banking and finance typically associated with the commerce clause.
D) Marbury v.Madison