To establish the existence of a duty of care the plaintiff must prove that at the time of the incident:
A) It was reasonably foreseeable that the plaintiff's conduct was unreasonable.
B) It was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant's conduct was unreasonable.
C) It was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant's conduct could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff's position.
D) The defendant knew or ought to have known that the plaintiff was in a vulnerable position.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In deciding whether the salient features of
Q2: Under the civil liability legislation in some
Q2: Which of the following is not a
Q5: According to the 'eggshell skull' rule:
A)If a
Q6: The plaintiff can establish that the defendant
Q7: Which of the following statements is not
Q8: A person who has carelessly caused harm
Q9: The High Court decided in the decision
Q9: Which of the following statements is not
Q16: Which of the following is not an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents