In Burns v. Reed, involving a civil rights action brought against a state prosecutor for a misleading presentation to a judge to obtain a warrant, the Supreme Court held:
A) that a prosecutor is not afforded absolute immunity for their role in any probable cause hearing.
B) a prosecutor is not afforded absolute immunity for the prosecutorial function of giving legal advice to the police.
C) a prosecutor is not afforded absolute immunity for their role as advocate for the state.
D) a prosecutor is afforded absolute immunity for their role as administrator or investigative officer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Bivens actions are:
A)constitutional tort actions against federal
Q3: According to Pinder v.Johnson,involving a lawsuit by
Q4: The most common mechanism for holding police
Q4: Which of the following is not a
Q6: The U.S.Supreme Court has put which of
Q7: Which of the following are remedies for
Q8: Judges have_from civil lawsuits for actions they
Q9: Which of the following are always protected
Q11: Internal review of police misconduct involves:
A) review
Q14: According to the Supreme Court in Anderson
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents