Police used a thermal imager to scan Kyllo's home because they had information that he was growing marijuana in his home.Officers did not have a warrant and claimed the search was in plain view.The Supreme Court ruled that:
A) use of a thermal imager did not alter the fact that the officers observed the marijuana in plain view.
B) use of a thermal imager to explore details of a home that in the past would have been unknown without a physical intrusion into the home is a search and subject to Fourth Amendment requirements.
C) thermal imagers are common devices and,therefore,the search was in plain view.
D) the use of a thermal imager is always illegal.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The first part of a writ of
Q18: According to the Supreme Court opinion in
Q20: In U.S.v.White,involving incriminating statements heard by law
Q21: An officer who uses a flash light
Q22: The use of a roadblock to screen
Q24: In California v.Ciraolo (1986),a case involving the
Q25: Which of the following is NOT an
Q26: Which of the following places is/are not
Q27: The special protection accorded by the Fourth
Q28: In Florida v.Bostick (1991),the court had to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents