Jack recently had a job interview that seemed to go exceedingly well by all objective standards.However,Jack noted that his interviewer seemed to be in a bad mood that day.To what extent should Jack be concerned about the latter piece of information?
A) He should be aware that he will likely be viewed less favorably by the interviewer than if the interviewer was in a good mood.
B) He should be very concerned about the interviewer's bad mood unless something happened immediately after the interview to improve the interviewer's mood.
C) He should assume that is virtually no chance he will be offered the position due to the interviewer's negative mood.
D) He should not be concerned at all since the interviewer's mood should have no bearing on how he or she evaluates Jack.
E) He should feel encouraged about his job prospects since the interviewer's bad mood will prompt him or her to give Jack the benefit of the doubt.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q74: People are more easily influenced by others
Q78: Two drivers on a highway are cut
Q82: The _ heuristic would suggest the following
Q84: Increasing the accessibility of a schema by
Q88: Schemas - our mental frameworks for organizing
Q89: We often use our _ to regulate
Q90: In general,information that is _ to remember
Q97: Many used car salesmen believe the asking
Q105: Briefly describe the representativeness heuristic and explain
Q109: The mood _ effect suggests that we
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents