Jimmy's Trucking Ltd has sued Hoffa Security Inc in tort. Jimmy's accuses Hoffa of committing torts that resulted in substantial economic losses. The evidence indicates that, aside from Jimmy's specific allegations in tort, Hoffa did not act in an unlawful or unauthorized way. The evidence further indicates that while Hoffa's actions were directed toward Jimmy's, Hoffa did not specifically intend to injure Jimmy's economic interests. On these facts, Hoffa may be liable for
A) intimidation but not conspiracy.
B) direct inducement to breach of contract, but not indirect inducement to breach of contract.
C) interference with economic relations but not interference with contractual relations.
D) conspiracy but not interference with economic relations.
E) conspiracy but not intimidation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)
Q2: Brownie Inc and Chewy Ltd are competitors
Q4: Jasmine operated a small chalet in a
Q5: Emily was involved in a business dispute
Q6: Sweety Cola and Bubbly Cola are competitors
Q7: Dylan committed the tort of deceit against
Q8: Generally speaking, there are three sets of
Q9: Dakota sued Mariah for the tort of
Q10: Brandon intended to start a new company.
Q11: Cornelius recklessly stored a large box of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents