Dan Leman is employed by True North Aviation Inc. as a pilot. He appears on the television news as an advocate for legalizing marijuana. His employer learns of this and the next day, without any notice, requires Dan to provide a urine sample to test for drug use or be fired. Dan wants to lay a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Which of the following is true?
A) Dan cannot succeed under the Canadian Human Rights Act because drug use is not a prohibited ground of discrimination.
B) The employer can demand a urine sample in these circumstances, but as the demand was made without notice it was invalid.
C) The employer can require a urine sample in these circumstances and need not give notice.
D) Even if the employer had not heard of the TV appearance, it could have demanded a urine sample for drug testing.
E) Both C and D
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: The British North America Act was amended
Q38: Where do the residual powers to deal
Q39: In the Big M Drug Mart case,
Q40: The federal government is planning a law
Q41: Which of the following may use a
Q43: Which of the following statements correctly describes
Q44: Ravinder Singh is a Sikh and, in
Q45: The Federal Government has power to make
Q46: Vanguard Metal Work Co. had to reduce
Q47: In which of the following circumstances would
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents