Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Business
Study Set
Macroeconomics Study Set 48
Quiz 4: Price Controls and Quotas: Meddling With Markets
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 161
True/False
Although they cost more than $200,000 when they were issued in the 1930s, the New York taxicab medallions are relatively inexpensive today, selling for around $3,000.
Question 162
True/False
A quota is the minimum amount of some good that can be bought and sold in the market.
Question 163
True/False
Quotas, price ceilings, and price floors are all types of quantity controls that the government may impose.
Question 164
True/False
Suppose the state of Mississippi sets a price floor in the market for cotton. If the floor is set below the market-clearing price of cotton, the floor will cause a surplus of cotton.
Question 165
True/False
In New York City there are more than 100,000 licensed taxicabs.
Question 166
True/False
If the demand curve for clams is downward sloping and the supply curve is upward sloping, a quota that is set above the equilibrium quantity will have no immediate effect on the market.
Question 167
True/False
Quantity controls usually take the form of price ceilings or price floors established by the government.
Question 168
True/False
A limit on the amount of a foreign currency people are allowed to buy is an example of a quota.
Question 169
True/False
To dispose of the unwanted surplus resulting from agricultural price floors, the European Union pays exporters to sell products at a loss overseas.
Question 170
True/False
If the demand curve for clams is downward sloping, a quota that is set below the equilibrium quantity will decrease the price that consumers pay for clams.
Question 171
True/False
If the state of Minnesota established a price floor in the market for pumpkins that was double the current market-clearing price, this would lead to an inefficient number of pumpkins sold in Minnesota.