Many argue that the existence of nuclear weapons makes just war reasoning obsolete. Johnson disagrees. What is his argument for this decision? Do you find it convincing? Are there some respects in which just war theory may be obsolete, while in others it is not? Why would someone argue this position, which Johnson denies?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q6: In just war theory, jus ad bellum
Q7: Minch argues that since personal autonomy is
Q8: "Supreme emergency" is a term that philosophers
Q9: Can duty to one's country or community
Q10: Pacifism is not an option for Muslims,
Q12: Which of the following is NOT among
Q13: What is the primary concern of Minch's
Q14: Johnson notes that there are two deep
Q15: Minch argues that if a war is
Q16: Hashmi notes that the concept of jihad
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents