a study by Langer, Blank, and Chanowitz 1978) a requester asked subjects to allow him to cut in front of them in line to make 5 xerox copies. One group of subject received no reason for the request. A second group received a good reason, "because I'm in a rush." A third group received a trivial placibic) reason, "because I have to make some copies." What happened?
A) Only the group getting the good reason complied more than the group getting no reason.
B) Only the group getting the trivial reason complied more than the group getting no reason.
C) Both of the groups getting a reason of either sort complied more than the group getting no reason.
D) All of the groups complied about equally.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Weapons of influence tend to be used
Q6: Which of the following will lead someone
Q7: What do the door-in-the-face technique a.k.a. the
Q8: Which of the following is not a
Q9: A marketer wishing to increase the perceived
Q11: In a 1981 study by Petty, Cacioppo,
Q12: As the environment becomes more complex, people
Q13: Ethologists have identified in some species certain
Q14: What is the contrast principle of perception?
A)
Q15: Weapons of influence exploit
A) judgmental heuristics
B) automaticity
C)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents