You have decided to appeal a speeding ticket in traffic court.You have assembled a number of witnesses who can testify that you were driving the speed limit and you have collected scientific data on the unreliability of police radar.Based on research on procedural justice (e.g.,Tyler,1990) ,in which of the following situations would you be most satisfied?
A) The judge only allows you time to present half of your argument, but still decides to lower your fine.
B) The judge doesn't have time to hear your entire argument, but decides to halve your fine.
C) The judge tells you that her docket is too full for her to hear your arguments, so dismisses the case against you.
D) The officer who ticketed you could not appear and the case against you is dismissed.
E) The judge listens carefully and asks questions before ordering you to pay the fine.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q78: Pennington & Hastie (1990)found that people on
Q79: Despite the fact that normative and informational
Q80: Ironically,a few scientific studies have revealed that
Q81: Our minds are not video cameras that
Q83: Confessions are not always what they seem.According
Q84: What is deterrence theory and what does
Q86: How effective are polygraph tests in detecting
Q86: How do jurors make sense of the
Q87: You are a social psychologist contacted by
Q93: Because minority opinions seldom hold sway in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents