Your son has not had the MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, rubella) because you are apprehensive about vaccines and their side effects. Your sister says that you are setting him up for a potentially damaging scenario. Which argument has the great scienti?c validity and why?
A) Your sister is correct in her warnings. If your son gets a severe case of mumps, he will likely develop a fatal secondary infection.
B) You are correct in protecting your son. If you can keep him from getting mumps when young, it is no longer a problem. It is simply a childhood disease.
C) Your sister is correct. Even if your son does not get the mumps now when he is young, but gets the infection later in life, there is a possibility of severe side effects.
D) You are correct to be apprehensive because vaccines have been the cause of autism in children.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: A common food intoxication is caused by
Q49: Which of the following is not a
Q50: Boiling will not inactivate Giardia lamblia cysts
Q51: Outbreaks of which protozoan disease have been
Q52: As recently as the 1980s, the medical
Q55: The best treatment for acute diarrhea is
Q56: In the absence of dietary carbohydrates, bacteria
Q57: Mumps causes permanent sterility in young male
Q58: Just back from a trip to South
Q59: Research does not indicate a link between
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents