
In theRicci v.DeStefanocase discussed in the text,seventeen whiteandone Hispanic firefighters sued the City of New Haven.The plaintiffs alleged the city's refusal to certify test results of an examination,which would have made them eligible for promotion,was a violation of Title VII's ban on disparatetreatment.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?
A) That the City of New Haven had engaged in illegal disparate impact discrimination.
B) That the City of New Haven had engaged in illegal disparate treatment discrimination.
C) That the City of New Haven had acted appropriately because there was a credible threat of a lawsuit.
D) That the City of New Haven had acted appropriately both because there was a credible threat of a lawsuit and because the City had established, using objective facts, that such a lawsuit could not be afforded.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: In thePrice Waterhouse v.Hopkins case referenced in
Q37: The plaintiff in theThompson v.North American Stainless,LP
Q38: A reasonable accommodation for a disabled employee
Q38: Which of the following is generally true
Q39: In the McKennon v.Nashville Banner Publishing Co.case
Q41: Which of the following is true regarding
Q42: Which of the following does Executive Order
Q43: In CASE 13.1Green v.Franklin National Bank of
Q44: Fact Pattern 13-1
Sam, who is age 60,
Q45: Trudy,a female manager at ABC Company,was surprised
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents