
In thePrice Waterhouse v.Hopkins case referenced in the text,a female was denied partnership in an accounting firm after being told that to improve her chances for partnership,she should walk more femininely,talk more femininely,dress more femininely,wear make-up,have her hair styled,and wear jewelry.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?
A) That the employer committed sexual stereotyping constituting illegal discrimination.
B) That the employer committed sexual stereotyping, but that such stereotyping did not constitute illegal discrimination.
C) That the employer committed sexual stereotyping but that in such cases, only nominal (minimal) damages are available.
D) That while such statements constituted sexual stereotyping, the employer could avoid liability if it could show that it had received client complaints regarding the female's masculine-type qualities.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: Which of the following must the plaintiff
Q31: CASE 13.2,EEOC v.Abercrombie & Fitch Stores,Inc.(2013)involved a
Q32: Denial of promotion in retaliation for a
Q33: How long must an employee have worked
Q34: In the Chevron USA,Inc.v.Echazabal case discussed in
Q37: The plaintiff in theThompson v.North American Stainless,LP
Q38: Which of the following is generally true
Q38: A reasonable accommodation for a disabled employee
Q39: In the McKennon v.Nashville Banner Publishing Co.case
Q40: In theRicci v.DeStefanocase discussed in the text,seventeen
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents