The Plaintiff in TheThompson V

The plaintiff in theThompson v.North American Stainless,LP case referenced in the text,alleged he was fired as a retaliatory action because his finance had filed a complaint of discrimination against their mutual employer.The employer alleged he had no cause of action.How did the US.Supreme Court rule?

A) The case was dismissed because the man was not personally subjected to discrimination.
B) The case was dismissed because the man was not personally subjected to discrimination and was not married to the person discriminated against.
C) The Court ruled that the man was in the "zone of interests" andcould sue for retaliation, but that his remedies were limited to reinstatement.
D) The Court ruled that the man was in the "zone of interests" and could sue for retaliation without limitation to his remedies.