Solved

In the Case OfEstate of Countryman V

Question 23

Multiple Choice
In the case ofEstate of Countryman v.Farmers Cooperative Association discussed in the text,the plaintiffs attempted to hold a member who owned 95% of an LLC personally liable as the LLC's manager,after propane gas delivered by the LLC exploded.How did the court rule?

In the case ofEstate of Countryman v.Farmers Cooperative Association discussed in the text,the plaintiffs attempted to hold a member who owned 95% of an LLC personally liable as the LLC's manager,after propane gas delivered by the LLC exploded.How did the court rule?


A) That only the LLC could be held liable.
B) That the manager was subject to personal liability along with the LLC regardless of whether it could be established that the manager participated in tortious conduct in performing his duties.
C) That only the manager, not the LLC, could be held liable.
D) The manager was not shielded from personal liability if he participated in tortious conduct while performing his duties.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents