
The Omnicare,Inc.v.NCS Healthcare,Inc.casediscussed in the text,involved a question of whether directors of an insolvent publicly traded company violated their fiduciary duty when they entered into an agreement for the sale of the company to a particular interested buyer regardless of other offers.The court ruled that:
A) the directors violated their fiduciary duty and lacked the authority to agree to an absolute lock-up guaranteeing the sale and agreeing to forgo consideration of future offers.
B) the directors violated their fiduciary duty because the agreement was kept secret from majority shareholders but that, otherwise, the agreement foregoing consideration of future offers would have been valid.
C) the directors violated their fiduciary duty because the agreement was kept secret from minority shareholders but that, otherwise, the agreement foregoing consideration of future offers would have been valid.
D) the directors satisfied all fiduciary duties because there was no evidence of bad faith or self dealing.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Which of the following are among the
Q22: Which of the following is considered an
Q23: In CASE 20.1Smith v.Van Gorkom (1985)discussed in
Q24: In the Air Products & Chemicals,Inc.v.Airgas,Inc.case discussed
Q24: The _ requires that officers and directors
Q26: Which of the following is true regarding
Q28: In theCarmody v.Toll Bros.,Inc.case discussed in the
Q30: A(n)_ gives the person to whom it
Q30: A shareholder derivative suit is a lawsuit
Q33: The business judgment rule is applicable only
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents