A null hypothesis is stated. The null hypothesis is, "There is no difference between one baby aspirin every day and no baby aspirin at all in prevention of myocardial infarction." What are the implications of this statement, concerning the null hypothesis and Type II error?
A) Accepting the null hypothesis when it actually is true means that the researcher has made a Type II error in concluding that there is no difference between one baby aspirin every day and no baby aspirin in the prevention of myocardial infarction.
B) Making the statement is itself a Type II error.
C) Whether the null hypothesis is true or not makes no difference in terms of Type II error.
D) Whether or not the researcher rejects the null hypothesis makes no difference, in terms of Type II error.
E) Accepting the null hypothesis when it actually is true means that the researcher concludes that there is no difference between one baby aspirin and no baby aspirin every day in the prevention of myocardial infarction, and there is no error.
F) Accepting the null hypothesis when it actually is false means that the researcher concludes that there is no difference between one baby aspirin and no baby aspirin every day in the prevention of myocardial infarction, when there actually is a difference. The researcher has therefore made a Type II error.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which group of numbers is the best
Q2: There are four data sets:
A: 1, 1,
Q4: A researcher conducts a statistical test that
Q5: If beta,
Q6: A researcher designs a study to
Q7: If a researcher wishes to predict with
Q8: Which of the illustrations of distribution curves
Q9: A researcher states in an article that
Q10: What is Q11: A researcher reports that the heights of![]()
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents