In the "Case Nugget", Ziva Jeweler, Inc

In the "Case Nugget", Ziva Jeweler, Inc. v. Car Wash Headquarters, Inc., what was the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Alabama, as related to the plaintiffs assertion that the carwash employees failed to safeguard jewelry in the trunk of a vehicle that was being cleaned?

A) The carwash was held liable for the stolen jewelry inside the trunk of the vehicle.
B) There was no evidence that the car wash knew or should have reasonably foreseen that it was taking responsibility for over $850,000 worth of jewelry.
C) The Supreme Court overturned the prior decision that the bailee was responsible for the loss of contents.
D) The carwash was held liable for both the stolen vehicle and the contents in the vehicle.
E) Since bailment had been established, as ruled by the trial court, the carwash was fully liable for the stolen jewelry.