Which case established the precedent that evidence obtained as a result of an invalid warrant is admissible at trial if the police reasonably believed the warrant to be valid?
A) Arizona v.Evans
B) Illinois v.Krull
C) Massachusetts v.Sheppard
D) United States v.Leon
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: In order to invoke the exclusionary rule
Q28: In Hudson v.Michigan, the U.S.Supreme Court articulated
Q29: The first step in challenging the reasonableness
Q30: Unlawfully seized evidence can be admitted at
Q31: According to past rulings by the U.S.Supreme
Q33: A weak connection between the unlawful search
Q34: In order to determine whether the good-faith
Q35: In which of the following case did
Q36: All of the following were identified as
Q37: If there has been a significant period
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents