In which of the following case did the Supreme Court affirmed that the exclusionary rule should not be applied in those cases in which the police act in good faith reliance on the assurance of a judge that a warrant?
A) Massachusetts v.Sheppard
B) Illinois v.Krull
C) Arizona v.Evans
D) United States v.Leon
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: Unlawfully seized evidence can be admitted at
Q31: According to past rulings by the U.S.Supreme
Q32: Which case established the precedent that evidence
Q33: A weak connection between the unlawful search
Q34: In order to determine whether the good-faith
Q36: All of the following were identified as
Q37: If there has been a significant period
Q38: Unlawfully seized evidence can be used in
Q39: All of the following are examples of
Q40: In which of the following court cases
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents