In ____________, the Supreme Court held that a Pennsylvania law designed to prevent subsidence damage from coal mining did not on its face violate either the Takings Clause or the Contracts Clause.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case described in the prompt is Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis (1987), which upheld a Pennsylvania law regulating coal mining. This case specifically addressed whether the law violated the Takings Clause or the Contracts Clause, and the Supreme Court ultimately found that it did not.

In ____________, the Supreme Court Held That a Pennsylvania Law