Which of the following laws was held not to be in violation of the dormant commerce clause for unfairly discriminating against out-of-state interests?
A) a law that imposed a surcharge of $2.50 on solid waste if the waste had been generated out of state, but only $.85 if generated within the state
B) a property tax exemption for charitable institutions that excluded organizations operated principally for the benefit of nonresidents
C) a state law that "tolled" the statute of limitations for a breach of contract case for times that the defendant was out of state
D) an environmental law prohibiting milk from being packaged in plastic containers when the result was a benefit to the large paper industry of the state
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: A federal law can preempt not only
Q11: The key factor in deciding if field
Q12: In general, a state law is found
Q13: The powers of the state government and
Q14: Under Article 1 §10, entitled "Powers Denied
Q15: The Supreme Court has held that a
Q16: One common criterion used by the Court
Q17: Which of the following is not a
Q18: The dormant commerce clause is a total
Q19: The Supreme Court has held that, because
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents