Many observers disagreed with the verdict in the famous first Rodney King case, believing that the verdict was not based on the evidence.In other words, many observers believe that race, money, and personal prejudices were the basis for the verdict, not the evidence, and that the law did not reflect what happened in the courtroom.To what jurisprudential school of thought would these observers belong?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The observers in question would belong to the Legal Realism school of thought, which holds that the law is not a set of abstract rules, but rather a collection of personal biases, social mores, and political agendas. Legal Realists believe that judges are not impartial arbiters of the law, but individuals who bring their own prejudices and perspectives to the bench. Therefore, they would likely view the verdict in the Rodney King case as a product of personal biases and political pressures, rather than a fair and impartial application of the law.

Many Observers Disagreed with the Verdict in the Famous First