Which of the following statements regarding Katko v.Briney is true?
A) Katko v.Briney is an example of a criminal appeal.
B) At the end of the trial, the landowner in Katko v.Briney was found responsible and would have to go to jail.
C) Katko v.Briney is an example of a civil case.While the trespasser faced a separate criminal proceeding, the landowner did not; he only had to pay damages after the verdict was upheld on appeal.
D) Because there was a dissenting opinion in the appeal of Katko v.Briney, there will have to be a new trial.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: The king most involved in the development
Q29: Our nation is committed to the rule
Q30: Which of the following is not a
Q31: If Webster sues Olson for breaking Webster's
Q32: Many observers disagreed with the verdict in
Q34: Which of the following was a traditional
Q35: Fuentes purchased a stove and stereo from
Q36: Describe the purpose of a case brief
Q37: A contract consists of
A) an offer, consideration,
Q38: If a criminal law is too vague
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents