In Robinson v.California, the defendant's conviction for being addicted to narcotics was overturned because:
A) the state failed to prove that the defendant was addicted.
B) the defendant was a mere user, not a seller of narcotics.
C) punishment for a condition or status is cruel and unusual.
D) the defendant's addiction was not voluntary.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: The vagueness doctrine prohibits laws that:
A)violate the
Q21: Recognition that people normally intend the natural
Q22: A presumption is:
A)adequate for conviction.
B)the same thing
Q23: A permissive inference is:
A)a possible but not
Q24: Robinson v.California declared disproportionate punishments to be:
A)cruel
Q25: The prosecution's responsibility to prove all elements
Q26: The preponderance of evidence is:
A)evidence that raises
Q27: The burden of production in a criminal
Q29: The prosecution may use inferences that are:
A)rational,
Q30: Corpus delicti is:
A)the body of a homicide
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents