Hazel Andrus believes her company has a systematic preference for males in executive positions, and that she has been denied a promotion because of this bias. Her employment contract contained an arbitration clause. Assuming the arbitration clause is fair and enforceable, can the EEOC still bring an action against the company on Hazel's behalf or is arbitration her sole way to enforce the law?
A) The arbitration clause provides her sole remedy and the EEOC is bared from bringing a claim.
B) The arbitration clause bars the EEOC, but it cannot stop Hazel from filing a lawsuit to enforce her claims.
C) The EEOC can pursue a claim, but they must also arbitrate the claim.
D) Even if Hazel must arbitrate her claims, the EEOC has an independent right to bring an action against the company on Hazel's behalf.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: Which of the following statements about agency
Q51: Mr. Sagacious was fired from his job
Q52: The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
Q53: Although the point is disputed, which of
Q54: In an "agency shop" an employee
A)must be
Q56: The Family and Medical Leave Act:
A)applies to
Q57: Cheryl Alessandro was driving down Hornet Street
Q58: The concept of wrongful termination of an
Q59: River City Corporation arranged to have Han
Q60: In the United States, legislation and case
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents