According to SCOTUS in Michigan v. Sitz (1990) , involving sobriety checkpoints, detaining a car briefly at a sobriety checkpoint:
A) is not a stop.
B) is a stop, but it is not covered by the Fourth Amendment.
C) is a stop to which the Fourth Amendment applies.
D) requires probable cause that someone in the car has committed a crime.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: Frisks are:
A)the most invasive type of search.
Q25: Fourth Amendment stops are not warrantless seizures.
Q26: In Maryland v. Wilson (1997), the case
Q27: The case of Michigan v. Sitz (1990)challenged
Q28: The reasonableness of roadblocks and checkpoints is
Q30: Outer clothing pat-downs do not constitute Fourth
Q31: According to SCOTUS in Michigan v. Sitz
Q32: Fourth Amendment stops and frisks are warrantless
Q33: Which of the following circumstances provides the
Q34: What case provides an excellent example of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents