According to SCOTUS in Michigan v. Sitz (1990) , involving sobriety checkpoints, detaining a car briefly at a sobriety checkpoint requires:
A) reasonable suspicion that the driver is driving under the influence.
B) probable cause that the driver is driving under the influence.
C) clear and convincing evidence that the driver is driving under the influence.
D) no individualized suspicion, because of the importance of the state's interest in addressing the drunk driving problem.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: In Maryland v. Wilson (1997), the case
Q27: The case of Michigan v. Sitz (1990)challenged
Q28: The reasonableness of roadblocks and checkpoints is
Q29: According to SCOTUS in Michigan v. Sitz
Q30: Outer clothing pat-downs do not constitute Fourth
Q32: Fourth Amendment stops and frisks are warrantless
Q33: Which of the following circumstances provides the
Q34: What case provides an excellent example of
Q35: If an officer was specifically patting down
Q36: Which of the following is a legitimate
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents