According to the Court of Appeals decision in United States v. Rodney :
A) consent to search a person includes consent to frisk the groin area.
B) consent to search a person does not include consent to frisk the groin area.
C) consent to search a person includes consent to frisk the groin area only if police specifically ask for such.
D) consent to search a person includes consent to frisk the groin area only for federal law enforcement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: The countervailing law enforcement interests against "no-knock"
Q15: Which of the following is not an
Q16: According to the SCOTUS holding in Arizona
Q17: In California v. Acevedo (1991), SCOTUS ruled
Q18: In order to conduct a consent search
Q20: Which of the following is not needed
Q21: In Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990), the police
Q22: In what landmark case did SCOTUS rule
Q23: In Wyoming v. Houghton , concerning the
Q24: Which of the following is true of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents