According to the SCOTUS holding in Arizona v. Gant (2009) , police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant's arrest, only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search, or if:
A) there is no second reason for a search.
B) the police have reason to believe that there is evidence in the car.
C) it is reasonable to believe that the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.
D) the police have reasonable suspicion that the car contains contraband or weapons.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Police ordinarily seek consent to search:
A)when
Q12: According to SCOTUS in Chimel v. California
Q13: The reasonableness of searches pursuant to search
Q14: The countervailing law enforcement interests against "no-knock"
Q15: Which of the following is not an
Q17: In California v. Acevedo (1991), SCOTUS ruled
Q18: In order to conduct a consent search
Q19: According to the Court of Appeals decision
Q20: Which of the following is not needed
Q21: In Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990), the police
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents