According to SCOTUS in Chimel v. California , involving the search of a house incident to an arrest for burglary of a coin shop:
A) it is not reasonable to search a person who is lawfully arrested.
B) it is not reasonable to search an entire house incident to a lawful arrest.
C) the Fourth Amendment does not protect searches incident to lawful arrests.
D) police must always have search warrants to search persons.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: In Wilson v. Arkansas , SCOTUS unanimously
Q8: Under the holding in Chimel v. California
Q9: In Knowles v. Iowa , concerning an
Q10: Consent that takes place when one person
Q11: Police ordinarily seek consent to search:
A)when
Q13: The reasonableness of searches pursuant to search
Q14: The countervailing law enforcement interests against "no-knock"
Q15: Which of the following is not an
Q16: According to the SCOTUS holding in Arizona
Q17: In California v. Acevedo (1991), SCOTUS ruled
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents