In Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation , the court held that
A) both the compensatory damages and punitive damages awards were clearly excessive, considering that Mr. Izell was 85 at the time of the lawsuit.
B) it was improper for the jury to consider Union Carbide's net worth in deliberating on the punitive damages award.
C) the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict, as well as the compensatory damage award of $30 million and punitive damage award of $6 million, against Union Carbide.
D) the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, as well as the compensatory damage award of $30 million and punitive damage award of $6 million, against Union Carbide.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: _ is used to create an inference
Q14: _ is a complete defense for a
Q15: Under _ liability theory, parties engaged in
Q16: The threat of physical injury gives rise
Q17: The need to prove a fact in
Q18: In Goggin v. New State Ballroom (dancer
Q19: Under doctrine of _, an employer will
Q20: Rights and duties in tort, as opposed
Q22: In Spitsin v. WGM Transportation, Inc .
Q23: In Cawley v. Eastman Outdoors, Inc .
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents