Solved

In Kelo V City of New London, Connecticut , the Court Held

Question 23

Multiple Choice

In Kelo v. City of New London, Connecticut , the court held that


A) eminent domain was unconstitutional because some of the benefits went to private individuals.
B) public purpose was narrowly defined and eminent domain was unconstitutional because the property would not be put to public use.
C) the taking of Kelo's property was appropriate under the city's eminent domain power because the development plan was for a public purpose.
D) it was unconstitutional for a state to allow the power of eminent domain to be used to satisfy a development plan.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents