The court may depart from the plain meaning rule when
A) its application would lead to an absurd result.
B) the meaning is unambiguous.
C) interpreting criminal law.
D) the legislature has been silent as to interpretation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: In Wiley v. RockTenn , the court
Q8: Legislation has become a dominant source of
Q9: A(n) _ is an order by a
Q10: In Ponder v. Graham , the court
Q11: When legislation is enacted that changes common
Q13: In State v. Nicoletto , the court
Q14: Statutes serve as public notice of the
Q15: In Papachristou v. Jacksonville , the Supreme
Q16: The assumption that the legislature understood the
Q17: Where the application of a statute remains
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents