In State V

In State v. Nicoletto , the court held that

A) both a holder of a coaching authorization and a teacher are licensed professionals subject to prosecution for sexual exploitation by a school employee.
B) the court must apply the plain meaning of the statute and affirm the jury's verdict against Nicoletto.
C) a holder of a coaching authorization is a licensed professional subject to prosecution for sexual exploitation by a school employee.
D) a person who coaches merely pursuant to a coaching authorization is not subject to prosecution for sexual exploitation by a school employee.