In Reynolds V

In Reynolds v. First NLC Financial Services, LLC , the court held that

A) the foreclosure deed was void, and the trial court properly entered an order quieting title and declaring that Reynolds owned the property in fee simple absolute.
B) the trial court mistakenly applied the doctrine of res judicata when it should have applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel.
C) the holder of the mortgage note should not have foreclosed, as Reynolds had made all mortgage payments.
D) Reynolds was precluded from raising those issues again under the doctrine of res judicata , and summary judgment was properly granted.