Robin works as a human resource manager for Banes & Obel. The company asks Robin to ensure that all suitable candidates including women and minorities are interviewed for open positions, but instructs her to not hire any minority applicants. When Robin reminds her supervisor that Title VII prohibits race discrimination she finds herself being removed from the interview process and all tasks related to the hiring process. In the above case, Banes & Obel:
A) has not violated Title VII since there was no discrimination during the interview process.
B) has not violated Title VII if they can prove the open positions in the organization were not suitable for minority candidates.
C) has clearly violated Title VII by instructing Robin to not hire minority applicants.
D) has not violated Title VII since Robin is no longer part of the decision-making process.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: Seniority, or the length of service on
Q21: In Massenburg v. Innovative Talent Solutions, Inc.,
Q22: In Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v Well
Q23: A telephonic marketing firm is looking at
Q24: A method of demonstrating that an employment
Q26: In a manufacturing company, promotions were based
Q27: The Civil Rights Act was aimed at
Q28: A teacher who is required to possess
Q29: In EEOC v. McClane Company, Inc., a
Q30: Section 706(e) (2)of Title VII was inserted
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents