In O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp ., the court of appeal held that:
A)whether the replacement was over or under 40 years of age was irrelevant.
B)the ADEA does not provide for disparate impact cases against older officers.
C)the ADEA did not require the employer to demonstrate any intention to discriminate.
D)None of the above.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., the court held that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) focuses on discrimination against employees because they are 40 or older, not on whether the replacement is younger than 40. The key issue is whether the employee was replaced by someone significantly younger, highlighting that the age of the replacement being over or under 40 is irrelevant to the claim of age discrimination.

In O'Connor V