In Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local No. 391 v. Terry, it was held that an employee who seeks back pay as a remedy for a union's violation of the duty of fair representation is entitled to:
A)punitive damages.
B)a jury trial.
C)monetary damages.
D)rescind his/her union membership.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local No. 391 v. Terry, the Supreme Court held that an employee who seeks back pay as a remedy for a union's violation of the duty of fair representation is entitled to a jury trial. This decision was based on the Seventh Amendment's guarantee of the right to a jury trial in civil cases.