In the case of Olmstead v.United States the Court decided that the practice of wiretapping was not covered by the Fourth Amendment.Which of the following was among the reasons?
A) The person had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the home.
B) The evidence was obtained only by hearing (and did not involve tangible items) the interception of a conversation could not qualify as a seizure.
C) The Fourth Amendment protects people, but not places.
D) There was no legitimate remedy for the alleged violation at the time; the exclusionary rule did not exist yet.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: Under the exigent circumstances exception, a law
Q6: Regarding Title III,a(n)_ person means a "person
Q8: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)authorizes courts
Q9: When one party to a communication consents
Q10: In Olmstead v.United States (1928),the Court held
Q12: Neither Title III nor the Fourth Amendment
Q13: The statutory-based exclusionary rule in title III:
A)
Q14: Within a reasonable time,but not later than
Q15: A transfer containing the human voice at
Q16: Which of the following is not part
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents