The U.S.Supreme Court decisions in both United States v.Montoya de Hernandez (1985) and United States v.Flores-Montano (2004) concerned border searches.The earlier case involved a search of a person,whereas the more recent case related to a vehicular search.Which of the following most accurately reflects the decisions in these two cases?
A) Reasonable suspicion is required for both person and vehicle searches at a border checkpoint.
B) No level of suspicion is required for either a vehicle or a person search occurring at a border checkpoint.
C) Reasonable suspicion is required for a search of a person at a border checkpoint, whereas no level of suspicion is required for a vehicle search.
D) Reasonable suspicion is required for a search of a vehicle at a border checkpoint, whereas no level of suspicion is required for a person search.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: An administrative search is an inspection of
Q30: If evidence of criminal activity is discovered
Q32: In the Vernonia School District 47J v.Acton
Q32: With respect to drug testing of government
Q36: The "special needs" doctrine is an exception
Q36: The only substantive restraint on the searches
Q37: The U.S.Supreme Court has further clarified that
Q38: When school administrators search for contraband in
Q39: Even at the borders of the United
Q40: Because the search guidelines for college students
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents