?Based on Chimel v.California,the key question in deciding whether or not a warrant is required to open a container seized incident to arrest of a person is:
A) Is the container closely associated with the arrestee's person?
B) Is the container still in the arrestee's immediate control?
C) Is the container owned by the arrestee?
D) Is the container both closely associated with the arrestee's person and still in the arrestee's immediate control?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: A police officer has informed a man
Q22: In the majority of states, arrest warrants
Q23: Officers may not deliberately move an arrested
Q26: The police may, in some situations, delay
Q28: For an item to be validly seized
Q28: The Gant v.Arizona (2009)case limited police ability
Q29: A police officer has arrested a man
Q32: For minor crimes unlikely to involve the
Q32: The U.S.Supreme Court case Gant v.Arizona (2009)overruled
Q36: In general, if a police officer makes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents