Police detectives begin to interrogate a criminal suspect without having read the Miranda warnings.During this initial questioning,the suspect makes an incriminating statement.The detectives,after hearing the incriminating statement,make the suspect aware of his Miranda rights.Questioning continues and the suspect repeats the incriminating information.
A) The incriminating statement is inadmissible.
B) The incriminating statement is admissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is inadmissible.
C) The incriminating statement is inadmissible, but any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement is admissible.
D) The incriminating statement is admissible, as is any derivative evidence that can be gathered from the information in the statement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: What conditions must be present to trigger
Q9: When considering the issue of waiver of
Q12: ?A criminal suspect is arrested and subsequently
Q13: ?To have a valid waiver of a
Q15: After obtaining a waiver of a suspect's
Q16: What is the essential reason why the
Q19: Officers place George Jetson under arrest,but they
Q20: A police interrogator conducted an interrogation of
Q24: Police interrogate an inexperienced, young person with
Q36: The Sixth Amendment's deliberate elicitation standard is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents