A majority of states have enacted "lifestyle rights laws" that protect workers' off-duty activities including cases of smoking,cohabitation,drinking.and single parenthood.What is the least effective argument by an employer to regulate off-the-clock activities in a state that has not enacted such lifestyle rights legislation?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument that there is no invasion of privacy since the employee is "at will" is the least effective because being an "at will" employee refers to the employment relationship and does not give the employer the right to regulate off-the-clock activities. Additionally, employees still have privacy rights even if they are "at will." Choices A, B, and D are more effective arguments for an employer to regulate off-the-clock activities, as they focus on business-related concerns such as productivity, health, and insurance costs.

A Majority of States Have Enacted "Lifestyle Rights Laws" That