In Soldano v. O'Daniels , the court re-examined the common-law rule of nonliability for not taking affirmative action to save someone from peril. The court considered which of the following factors with respect to imposing duties for affirmative action by third parties?
A) The examination and balancing of intervening causes and physical capabilities.
B) The financial duties of victim to rescuer.
C) Moral blame attached to the defendant's conduct and the policy of preventing future harm.
D) Moral blame attached to the victim's conduct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q72: The harshness of the contributory negligence doctrine
Q73: A(n) _ is a sudden, unexpected event
Q74: A form of strict liability applies to
Q75: While driving his car five miles over
Q76: Defenses to an action in strict liability
Q78: Which of the following is\are considered in
Q79: Cal sprayed pesticide on his crops in
Q80: In determining the duty of care owed
Q81: Under the Third Restatement, possessors of land:
A)
Q82: What is the difference between contributory negligence
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents