Selling the same goods at different prices depending on location:
A) Is a violation of the Robinson-Patman Act.
B) Is legal if the pricing is designed to meet the competition.
C) Was how Staples was charged with antitrust violations.
D) Both a and c

Question

Selling the same goods at different prices depending on location:
A) Is a violation of the Robinson-Patman Act.
B) Is legal if the pricing is designed to meet the competition.
C) Was how Staples was charged with antitrust violations.
D) Both a and c

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Selling the same goods at different prices depending on location is legal if the pricing strategy is designed to meet the competition. This practice is known as competitive pricing and is not inherently illegal under U.S. antitrust laws, provided it does not involve predatory pricing intended to eliminate competition.

Selling the Same Goods at Different Prices Depending on Location